Showing posts with label loans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loans. Show all posts

Sunday, February 22, 2009

1.5% Buyer Penalty to Help the Economy

What kind of incentive are Fannie and Freddie offering to help build buyer confidence and stimulate the economy? How about a 3/4% penalty charge for buyers with good credit that don't have 25% down payments! If your credit is under 700 try a 1.5% penalty. While I realize they are trying to cover their tail from future property value tailspins, it seems to me there needs a solution which will not prevent buyers from buying especially good credit candidates. The risk could be underwritten with perhaps a lesser penalty charged to these buyers. Some lenders are fighting this ridiculous amended clause, but unless more people are aware of this there will not be any change.

This article was posted on the NAHB e-letter I receive and I wanted to share the absurdity with my bloggers.

There are alternatives such as FHA but those come with great limitations. It is getting a little crazy out there and you need to be aware.

As of April 1, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are increasing the delivery fees they charge lenders based on FICO scores, downpayment amounts and other loan characteristics. Most major lenders already are pricing in these higher fees, effectively raising costs to borrowers immediately. Lenders can pass these fees on to the consumer in the form of higher interest rates rather than as an upfront charge. Under the new guidelines, even applicants who assumed that their FICO credit scores would get them favorable rates will be charged more unless they can come up with downpayments of 30% or more.

For example, a buyer with a 699 FICO score who brings a sizable downpayment of about 25% to the table will be hit with a 1.5% delivery fee at closing under the new guidelines. A buyer with a FICO score between 700 and 720 will pay an extra three-quarters of a point. Even someone with a 739 FICO — once considered a platinum guarantee of the best rates available — will get dinged with a quarter-point add-on. Condominium buyers who cannot come up with a 25% downpayment will be hit with a three-quarter point add-on penalty, no matter how high their credit score — simply because they are not purchasing a traditional detached, stand-alone house. Without congressional intervention or new marching orders from the companies’ regulator, the add-on fees are here to stay. But there’s an alternative available for just about anyone who wants to avoid the fees: Federal Housing Administration mortgages, where downpayments go as low as 3.5% and credit scores are not an issue for most applicants. (www.washingtonpost.com)
Washington Post (2/14/09); Kenneth R. Harney

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

FHA and Condo Loan Options

FHA was once considered a four letter word. Builders could care less about qualifying and lenders were hard pressed to justify the amount of time and work required to close on an FHA loan.

Are you wondering what is happening with the local, regional and national real estate market. Well me too. I am working twice as hard these days to hep assist my clients with securing their mortgages since that seems to be the biggest obstacle to the bulletproof transaction I like to create around each of my client purchase contracts.

So, lately many of my first time buyer's are inquiring about whether this property is FHA qualified or what the requirements are for an FHA loan. Usually the two main barriers to securing an FHA loan on a property are that the builder is still in control (not an established association yet) OR the bylaws of an existing association have a right of first refusal which is an immediate NO to qualifying.

So, now many of my clients are asking me "is this one qualified"...

So now I am referring them (or checking myself) at this Federal Housing Authority (FHA) site:

https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/condlook.cfm

I hope this helps and remember, there are options available to buyers with less than 5% down to make a purchase. Of course, usually the more money you put down the better your rates and loan terms (for the most part) will be.

Good luck!

Thursday, March 13, 2008

New FHA Loan Increases: The Sky is Not the Limit

Many of my clients have been excited to hear that the government has increase the Federally insured lending limits to over $700,000 without the loan being considered a jumbo (ie higher interest rate) loan.

Great news , right?

Hold it. That news is based on the average sales price of a home. Areas like California and New York City will reap the higher rewards, but here is what Cook County Residents can expect from the increase. Basically, if you are buying a multi-unit family building your conforming loan limits improved but standard single-unit condos or homes are at the same limits as before (for Cook County and the collar counties). See how your area is impacted here:

NEW FHA LOAN LIMITS

Effective 03/06/2008

MSA Name

County Name

County

State

One-Family

Two-Family

Three-Family

Four-Family

Code

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISION

COOK

31

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISIO

DUPAGE

43

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISIO

KANE

89

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISION

KENDALL

93

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

LAKE COUNTY-KENOSHA COUNTY, IL-WI METROPOLITAN DIV

LAKE

97

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISION

WILL

197

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN DIVISION

MCHENRY

111

IL

$410,000

$524,850

$634,450

$788,450

SPRINGFIELD, IL (MSA)

SANGAMON

167

IL

$271,050

$347,000

$419,400

$521,250


Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Loan Rates Fall again


Loan rates for residential mortgages are down again as the economy continues to put pressure on the downward trend for fixed loan rates. The questions I am hearing from my clients is should I refinance or should we wait to buy. The answer I am telling people is rates should remain flat and continue on the downward trend pending of course good economic news (something we haven't seen in a while nor will in my opinion). If however, the stock market continues to get slammed then perhaps investors will be shifting their money to bonds and we can see a weakening of these historically low interest rates.

Waiting to refinance is probably a safer bet, but waiting to purchase in order to capture an 1/8-1/4 points on a loan is possible if you're not in any hurry but look at where the rates are right now! Really really low. If you're out looking at properties and see a glut of properties fitting your wish list then waiting is a consideration, however, if the area you are looking does not have a large selection I would say continue the search and when the property comes along that looks good, put in an offer and secure those low rates now. I don't think we will see the rates going below 5.0% unless the recession which is looming becomes a certainty.

Long-term mortgage interest rates continued lower Friday, and the benchmark 10-year Treasury bond yield held steady at 3.59 percent.

The 30-year fixed-rate average dipped to 5.47 percent, and the 15-year fixed rate slipped to 4.95 percent. The 1-year adjustable rate sank to 5.1 percent.

The 30-year Treasury bond yield was down at 4.31 percent

Friday, January 11, 2008

January Loan Rates Dropping


Long-term mortgage interest rates continued to fall Tuesday, and the benchmark 10-year Treasury bond yield dipped to 3.78 percent.


The 30-year fixed-rate average sank to 5.55 percent, and the 15-year fixed rate slid to 5.06 percent. The 1-year adjustable rate, however, was up at 5.34 percent.

My recommendations are still to secure a 30 year loan since the margin continues to shrink between the fixed and adjustable rate mortgages.


The 30-year Treasury bond yield slipped to 4.31 percent.


Sunday, December 09, 2007

Sub Prime Bailout

As many of you have probably heard, the Federal government has implemented a policy which would give an estimated 1.2 million homeowners out there an extention on their 'teaser rate' loans which are scheduled to go up in the next 6 months.

These rates would be locked or up to five years pending a rebound in the economy and an improvement in the housing industry in general.

It is an interesting yet controversial move because some feel it is only a bandaid and that this may postpone the foreclosure situation until the next administration.

Time will tell.

Here is an article from Inman news on the topic:

Administration, lenders defend rate freeze plan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Backers say up to 1.2 million loans eligible for refis, workouts
Thursday, December 06, 2007

By Matt Carter
Inman News


A plan to refinance or freeze the interest rates on up to 1.2 million subprime adjustable-rate mortgages for five years is not a "silver bullet" solution for all homeowners, but will help reduce the impact of the housing downturn on the economy and communities affected by foreclosures, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Thursday.

Paulson was the point man as the Bush administration rolled out a much-anticipated agreement with mortgage lenders and loan servicers in the face of criticism not only from consumer advocates -- some say it won't help enough borrowers -- but warnings from some in the lending industry who said an interest rate freeze could discourage investors from financing future loans.

The agreement has the backing of the American Securitization Forum, which represents companies that issue mortgage backed securities, as well as investors, loan servicers and rating agencies. ASF Executive Director George Miller said the agreement provides a common framework to evaluate borrowers̢۪ situations, and expedites processes for loan servicers to pursue refinancing and loan modification options on a more systematic basis.

The ASF today published a 34-page document outlining procedures for servicers to follow in streamlining refinancings or loan modifications on ARM loans that are scheduled to reset in the next 2 1/2 years.

Paulson said he hoped that the guidelines would be adopted as "customary standard practice across the entire servicing industry," because the current system would "not be sufficient" to handle the 1.8 million owner-occupied subprime ARM resets expected in 2008 and 2009.

According to the framework, loans eligible for streamlined refinancing or modification such as an interest rate freeze must be ARM loans on owner-occupied homes originated between Jan. 1, 2005 and July 31, 2007, with an initial interest rate reset between Jan. 1, 2008 and July 31, 2010.

Under the guidelines, only borrowers with FICO scores less than 660 and facing an increase in monthly payments greater than 10 percent will be eligible for fast-track loan modifications. Borrowers who don't meet the "FICO test" may qualify for loan modifications after individual reviews of their current income and debt obligations.

Although the Bush administration says up to 1.2 million ARM loans may be eligible for refinancing or modifications, the Center for Responsible Lending, estimated that a much smaller number of families -- perhaps 145,000 -- will actually see any relief.

The administration's estimate is based on the belief that nearly two-thirds of the 1.8 million homeowners with subprime ARM loans facing interest rate resets in the next two years can afford their introductory rate, but won̢۪t be able to afford higher payments after their loans reset.

But many subprime borrowers have second, "piggyback" mortgages that pose obstacles to loan modifications, CRL warned, and loan servicers will still have financial incentives to foreclose on loans, rather than engage in workouts.

"The plan relies on voluntary decisions by individual mortgage servicers and investors, (and) does not remove the strong financial and legal incentives servicers have to foreclose on loans rather than modify them," CRL said in a statement. "Recent experience shows that the likelihood of widespread modifications is small under this 'business as usual' approach."

CRL said Congress should also allow bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of mortgage loans for borrowers who file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection, saying it could prevent up to 600,000 foreclosures. The lending industry opposes pending legislation that would change the bankruptcy code to do just that, saying it would raise the cost of borrowing (see Inman News story).

The rating agency Standard & Poor's issued a report raising concerns that wholesale interest rate freezes on subprime ARM loans could force it to lower its ratings on subprime mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Such concerns have prompted others in the industry to warn that wholesale loan workouts will discourage investment in MBS, worsening the ongoing credit crunch.

Paulson said the plan, while not perfect, is part of a broader effort the Bush administration has undertaken to address the housing downturn. Those efforts are in two areas, he said: limiting the impacts of the current downturn, and taking steps to protect housing and credit markets in the future by tightening regulations.

To limit the impact of the current downturn, the administration's FHASecure program allows some homeowners who are already in default to refinance into loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson said today that FHA has received 118,000 refinance applications since the program was announced in September, and that 35,000 homeowners have already refinanced into FHA-backed loans.

Jackson said FHA expects to process another 50,000 refinance loans by the end of the year, and that a pending bill to lower FHA down payment requirements, allow it to insure larger mortgages, and expand "risk-based" pricing, would allow FHA to back an additional 250,000 loans by the end of 2008. All told, Jackson said, FHA may be able to guarantee up to 800,000 loans in fiscal year 2008.

On the regulatory front, President Bush said at a press conference today that the Federal Reserve will announce stronger lending standards later this month. HUD and federal banking regulators, Bush said, are taking steps to improve disclosure requirements.

Bush chastised Congress for failing to pass an FHA modernization bill or legislation to reform oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

Paulson and James Lockhart, director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), echoed the president's call for a GSE modernization bill.

Lockhart said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "have played an extremely important role in supporting the mortgage market as all the problems erupted this summer," growing their market share of all new mortgages to more than 60 percent, up from 38 percent last year.

Although the House passed a GSE reform bill in May, there is disagreement in the Senate over limits on Fannie and Freddie's loan portfolios and whether to raise the $417,000 conforming loan limit.

Friday, November 16, 2007

Chicago Spire Gets $2.2 Billion Loan


Chicago's much talked about controversial spire highrise slid in under the press radar and was granted the $2.2 billion loan this week for the 115-story residential tower located at 400 E. North Water Street in downtown Chicago's Streeterville neighborhood. The project is scheduled to begin September 2008.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Loan Refinance Changes

Refinancing Adjustable-Rate Loans Becomes Harder for Borrowers

By Ruth Simon
From The Wall Street Journal Online

With rates on many homeowners' adjustable-rate mortgages rising, some who would like to refinance into a new loan are finding they can't.

In some cases, that is because their loan carries a prepayment penalty, which would force them to come up with thousands of dollars if they refinance in the first few years. Such penalties are common with so-called option adjustable-rate mortgages, which typically carry a low teaser rate that rises sharply after an introductory period.

Other borrowers are getting caught short by a changing housing market -- one in which home prices have flattened and lenders are beginning to tighten their standards after a long period of making mortgages easier and easier to get. The challenges are greatest for homeowners whose credit has declined since they took out their last loan and for those who have little if any equity. Some of these borrowers are still able to refinance but are finding it more costly than they expected.

These new challenges come at a time when many borrowers who took out adjustable-rate mortgages are facing higher payments. There are about $1.1 trillion to $1.5 trillion in ARMs that will face rate increases this year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. The MBA expects borrowers to refinance as much as $700 billion of those mortgages.
"The decrease in property values, combined with prepayment penalties, is making it very challenging for people to get out of these loans," says Ed Shanks, an executive vice president with U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a unit of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is seeing more loans fall through, particularly in markets such as Arizona, California, Colorado and Ohio, where home values have softened. It could be "the tip of the iceberg," Mr. Shanks says.

In recent years, many homeowners refinanced repeatedly -- to get a better rate, lower their payment, consolidate debt or pull out cash. Even now, mortgage rates remain relatively attractive, though they have moved up from their recent lows in early December, and most borrowers still should be able to take advantage of them. The challenges for homeowners could increase if lenders continue to tighten standards and the housing market remains soft.
Antonio Papa, a construction worker, took out an option ARM with a 1% introductory rate in 2005 on a second home he owns in Jupiter, Fla. The rate jumped to 5.6% in September 2005 and has since climbed to 7.5%. "I was looking to refinance to have more stability," he says. He has decided to hold off because his option ARM carries a prepayment penalty that would force him to pay six months' of interest if he refinances within the first three years. Mortgage brokers often receive higher payouts for putting borrowers into a loan with a prepayment penalty, says Sandra Barrett, a loan officer in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., who was working with Mr. Papa.Prepayment penalties are most common with option ARMs and loans made to borrowers with scuffed credit. Some 84% of option ARM loans made last year carried a prepayment penalty, according to an analysis by UBS AG that looked at mortgages that were packaged into securities and sold to investors.

The challenges facing borrowers are becoming more apparent at a time when opportunities for refinancing are narrowing. Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages dropped to their lowest levels in 14 months in December, but have recently drifted higher. Rates on 30-year fixed-rate loans currently average 6.45%, according to HSH Associates in Pompton Plains, N.J., up from 6.16% in early December.

"The best deals in going from an ARM to a fixed-rate are passing," says Doug Duncan, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association. "If anything, rates are likely to move up rather than down."

Meanwhile, there are signs that some lenders are beginning to tighten their standards. The shift comes after a long period of liberal lending practices that made it easy for borrowers to finance 100% of a home's value or get a mortgage without documenting their income and assets.
In a survey released Monday by the Federal Reserve Board, roughly 15% of domestic banks reported that they had tightened credit standards on residential mortgage loans in the past three months, the highest share since the early 1990s.

This month, Wells Fargo & Co. will begin reducing by 5% the maximum amount it will lend to certain riskier borrowers in "declining" markets. Those markets, covering more than 150 counties in two dozen states, include parts of California, Florida, Michigan and Ohio.

The change "reflects the tighter requirements of our investors," a Wells spokesman says. "I think all lenders are experiencing this kind of tightening of credit standards." Investors who buy mortgage-backed securities have been growing more concerned about credit quality as defaults have increased.

CitiMortgage, a unit of Citigroup Inc., last month began requiring that borrowers who take out a "stated-income" loan sign an affidavit attesting to the fact that information about their income in the application is accurate and hasn't been modified by their mortgage broker or loan officer. The change is designed "to protect the borrower as well as the lender," because borrowers may have trouble repaying the loan if their income is overstated, a company spokesman says.
On Jan. 30, Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored mortgage finance company, tightened its standards for so-called interest-only loans, which let borrowers pay interest and no principal in the loan's early years.

Other homeowners are being flummoxed by lower appraisals. Those most likely to be affected bought a home or refinanced in the past year or two and have little, if any, equity. "The block to refinancing is mainly located in those areas of the U.S. where there is little or no appreciation," says Peter Lansing, a mortgage banker in Denver.

Michelle Thompson, a medical-claims associate in North Glenn, Colo., pulled out $30,000 when she refinanced her mortgage last year, boosting her loan to $183,000. She would like to refinance again in order to lower her monthly payment, but when she went to apply for a new loan, she discovered that her mortgage debt exceeded the home's value.
Some borrowers are trying novel strategies. Charlotte Keyes, a program/project manager in Shawnee, Kan., refinanced her mortgage two years ago, pulling out $32,000 to consolidate her debt. With the rate on her loan set to rise to roughly 10%, Ms. Keyes is looking to refinance. Because she owes more than the home is worth, she plans on taking out a $13,000 auto loan and using the funds to pay down her mortgage.
With ARMs, "the tag line you always hear...is you can refinance with no problem," says A.W. Pickel, a mortgage banker with LeaderOne Financial Corp. in Overland Park, Kan., who is working with Ms. Keyes. "But it is a problem." The appraisal for Ms. Keyes's last loan was inflated, he adds.

Mitch Ohlbaum, a mortgage broker in Los Angeles, says some of his customers have had to tap the equity on their primary homes in order to pay down a portion of the debt on an investment property and be approved for a refinancing. Other borrowers have had to take a mortgage with a higher interest rate because their high debt load makes them a less attractive borrower.
Some borrowers facing prepayment penalties are sitting on the sidelines for now. David Lorentz, a high-school teacher in San Francisco, recently tried to refinance the option ARM on a four-unit apartment building he owns as an investment. He wanted to pull out cash to pay for renovations and college tuition for his children, but found he would have to pay an $18,000 prepayment penalty. "I guess I didn't get a good loan," says Mr. Lorentz, who plans to refinance in August when the penalty period expires.